New data on CCSVI from Canadian study using ‘gold standard’ technique
October 8, 2013
Results from MS Society of Canada funded study exploring CCSVI and MS in children
August 21, 2013
New results from MS Society of Canada funded study exploring CCSVI and MS
July 30, 2013
CCSVI Case-Control Neurosonography Results Announced
February 27, 2013
MS Society partners in CCSVI clinical trial
September 28, 2012
Researchers Continue With Their Progress in the Seven Funded CCSVI Studies in MS
September 4, 2012
Research Teams Report on 18 Months of Progress from MS Societies' Initial Studies on CCSVI and MS
January 27, 2012
CCSVI in the media
MS Patients Did Not Benefit from CCSVI Intervention Based on the Prospective ... - PR Web (press release)
Wolfville couple adamant Liberation treatment offers hope - Hants Journal
MS specialist accused of defaming heart surgeon in email about controversial ... - National Post
Ottawa doctor facing lawsuit from Barrie surgeon over emails - Ottawa Citizen
Aufdehnung der Halsvenen als Multiple Sklerose-Therapie: Neurologen raten ... - DMSG Multiple Sklerose Nachrichten
Multiple Sklerose: Neurologen raten von einer Aufdehnung der Halsvenen als ... - Curado.de
New study challenges controversial multiple sclerosis treatment - Globe and Mail
What is CCSVI?
Do these reports of a possible association between insufficient vein drainage and MS mean that MS is caused by venous insufficiency?
Why can't Canadians get treatment in Canada, when it is available in countries like the US, Scotland, Australia and others?
The science surrounding CCSVI seems to be evolving rapidly. Are the seven studies funded by the MS Society of Canada and National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) still relevant?
Many people with MS can't afford to wait until these theories are proven or disproven, there is nothing else working for them. How can the MS Society not support treatment for CCSVI, at the very least on a compassionate basis?